Taking On Race as an Artificial Construction
There is no real differentiation amongst human
beings between races. Scientists have tried numerous times in the past to find a
difference between the biological makeup of Blacks and Whites by comparing
the size and structure of their skeletons and other body parts. According to
episode one of “Race: The Power of an Illusion”, there have been experiments in
scientific history that evaluated the brain size of African and European
individuals. When gathering human remains for evaluation, the brains of African
women and European males were compared and contrasted with one another. This
resulted to an inaccurate conclusion that African individuals generally have a
smaller brain and skull size than that of European individuals. The reasoning
behind these experiments was to 'prove' why we, as a civilization, should treat
people of color inferior to Whites (Omi and Winant 1994).
Several years later,
it was proven that there is no real differentiation between the size of an
African and a European individual's brain. Even after this error was rectified,
racism and the dehumanization of African individuals has existed for several decades.
Additionally, studies, and misinterpretations of the Bible were wrongfully used
to justify the reasoning behind the exploitation and marginalization of people
of color. When attempting to comprehend why racisms still exist, it is
important to keep in mind that there have been many laws that were established
in American history, which subject people of color to inequality. The idea of
race and what it means to be a part of a racial group is deeply embedded in us
as human beings. For several decades, we have been disciplined to judge other
human beings based on their phenotype, which gives us more of a sense of
(racial) organization.
In episode one of “Race:
The Power of an Illusion”, students took samples of their Mitochondrial DNA,
which could solely be inherited from their mother (Wilson and Hunt 2002). In doing so, the students chose who they
believed they were going to be more genetically similar, the person that they
chose were often people of their own racial. Turns out the students whom were
racially similar did not share as many genetic similarities with their own race
as anticipated. Pertaining to the two examples above, and a combination of
other facts that prove that race is solely a sociological term, no one can deny
that Pilar Ossorio’s argument is valid.
After reflecting on
the idea of race and its importance in today’s society, I believe it is
imperative to inform ourselves about the history of race and what it means to
be classified into a racial group. I
am not ashamed to identify myself as an African American woman, whom has
Caribbean roots. I have strong cultural pride and it continues to get stronger
as I learn more about Black individuals and all that they have endured in the
past. As I dig deeper into understanding the significance of race, it angers me
to know that a single term, with the help of other aspects, could cause such an
abominable effect on the human race.
Work Cited
Clark, B. A. (2013, April 06). Laws
Designed to Disarm Slaves, Freedmen, and African-Americans. Retrieved September
20, 2016, from http://www.old-yankee.com/rkba/racial_laws.html
Omi, M., & Winant, H. (1994). Racial
formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1990s (3RD ed.). New
York: Routledge.
H. (2016, June 27).
RACE: The Power
Of An Illusion - Episode 1: The Difference Between Us (PBS Documentary).
Retrieved September 20, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B7_YHur3G9g
Wilson, J. H., & Hunt, T.
(2002). Molecular biology of the cell, 4th edition: A problems approach.
New York: Garland Science.
URLs
http://www.pbs.org/race/000_About/002_04-background-01-03.htm
http://sociology.about.com/od/R_Index/fl/Race.htm
Cassie,
ReplyDeleteIt was great reading your paper, very concise and clear to understand. The visual was very well used and thoroughly explained in your paper. You provide great topics for deeper conversation and analysis as was the example of the different skull sizes. However, there are many other topics that are briefly mentioned throughout your paper that you could express a lot more. Also it is not a bad idea to better connect all your sources to the Ossorio's comment and emphasize how this better proves or disproves Ossorio's comment. As well you can write a little more about your racial identity and much more about how you feel about. You do mention how you feel about but I do feel like a little more can be said in regards to the last two questions of the blog post. Other than that your paper was very clear to understand and follow all throughout.
Thanks for the great tips! I'll get right on it :)
DeleteHi Cassie,
ReplyDeleteThis was a good post. You easily met all of the requirements for the assignment and made your perspective very clear and concise. I would caution you about using repetitive wording like differentiation. Diversify your vocabulary so that you effectively communicate linked ideas. I only have two small corrections that perhaps may help you state your case. One, when you speak about racism and the dehumanization of African peoples, we are talking about a centuries long agenda and perpetuation of oppression, not decades. Two, when you mention that the Bible was "misinterpreted to justify the marginalization and exploitation of people of color", realize that the Bible does in fact support the institution of enslavement and does give very explicit instructions for how to carry out harsh and inhumane (by today's standards) forms of punishment. Lastly, be careful of your sentence structure and grammar. The post was thought provoking and your sources and supporting sites where very interesting. I think I would have liked to read more of your thoughts minus the 500 word limit cap.
Best,
Timothy McGhee
Thanks for the great advice Timothy! I will work on it :)
Delete