Sunday, October 2, 2016

Revision: The Misinterpretations of Race

Ingrid Diaz                                                                                                         September 21, 2016
The Misinterpretations of Race
Race is defined as a group of individuals that share supposed physical and/or genetic traits. The sociological concept of race suggests that we are socialized to differentiate individuals by their physical/external attributes. We are brought up to believe that we can identify another individual’s race just by looking at them. We divide individuals into categories of race based on the color of their skin, the texture of their hair, and the shape/color of their eyes. Because we are socialized to accept and integrate the concept of race into our lives, we try to attribute these physical/external differences to internal differences. The scientific concept of race suggests that these external attributes must derive from some sort of genetic similarity.
In the film “Race: The Power of an Illusion, Episode 1,” Pilar Ossorio states, “there is just as much or more genetic difference between individuals within the same racial group as there is between different racial groups.” In this same film, a group of students had their mDNA tested for genetic markers. Mitochondrial DNA is passed down to an individual from their maternal side. The group of students consisted of different races including Black, White, Asian and Latino. Before the study was conducted, the students hypothesized that they will have more similarities with others that are racially the same as them. However, the results proved Ossorio’s statement. The student’s mDNA demonstrated that the students had just as much or more difference with the other students that were racially the same as them than with the students who were not racially the same. The physical traits that we adapt through environmental differences do not reflect genetic differentiation (Templeton, 2013).

https://goo.gl/images/wMHixZ
 
According to the United States Census Bureau, there are five races in which an individual can identify with (http://www.census.gov/topics/population/race/about.html). These races include White, Black/African American, Asian, Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander and Other. An individual can mark more than one box in this section of the census. This makes it difficult for me to choose a race when filling out forms because I do not identify myself with any of these races. I consider myself Hispanic and not any of the previously mentioned races. However, according to the United States Census Bureau, Hispanic and Latino is not considered a race instead they are considered an ethnicity. Ethnicity is defined as belonging to a social group that has similar cultural backgrounds.

https://goo.gl/images/2OXv0U
Noticeably, many individuals of Hispanics and Latino/a ethnic background have been identifying themselves as white. According to a New York Times article, researchers found that approximately 2.5 million of Hispanics/Latinos who choose “Some Oher Race” in the 2000 census changed their race to “White” in the 2010 census (http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/22/upshot/more-hispanics-declaring-themselves-white.html?_r=0). This research suggests that in fact choosing a race can be very confusing for Hispanics because the options provided are not relevant enough. According to “Criollo, Mestizo, Mulato, LatiNegro, Indigena, White, or Black? The US Hispanic/Latino Population and Multiple Responses in the 2000 Census,” the way that Hispanics identify their race is based on what age the individual entered the country, socioeconomic status, and the ability to pass as White. This suggests that Hispanics are labeling themselves as white based on stereotypical beliefs of what it means to be white.
 
Works Cited
Amaro, H., & Zambrana, R. E. (2000). Criollo, Mestizo, Mulato, LatiNegro, Indigena, White, or Black? The US Hispanic/Latino Population and Multiple Responses in the 2000 Census. American Journal Of Public Health, 90(11), 1724-1727
Templeton, A. R. (2013). Biological races in humans. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(3), 262-271. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.04.010
 

No comments:

Post a Comment